Areas of Expertise:

W. Scott Smith has been working in alternative research for about twenty years. He is currently working on a Break-Through Physics that was originally proposed in NASA's Break Through Physics Propulsion Program, BPPP. This developing technology, if it can be made at commercial levels, will open up the Electromagnetic Energy of the Quantum Vacuum. Many experiments point toward the probability that this can be achieved within a few years. In fact, Mr. Smith was recently encouraged to submit a paper to NASA's NIAC committee which desires to fund some of the more-promising approaches that were discussed in the final report of the BPPP. Mr. Smith has published two papers in the Proceedings of the Nature Philosophy Alliance and had his work endorsed by leading scientists. Mr. Smith was invited to speak at the International Space Development Conference where he presented his work to experts in his sub-field of Quantum Vacuum Engineering.

Mr. Smith follows the technical details of the Climate Change Discussion, with a focus including global dimming and atmospheric particulates. He is deeply concerned that current experiments that deposit light reflective particulates into the atmosphere may in fact, reflect far more nighttime and daytime heat-energy back onto the Earth than is reflected in terms of incoming energy from the Sun.

Recent Comments by W. Scott Smith

• "The most efficient use of alcohol fuel is to use the 40% alcohol that comes off of the first distillation. This saves the distillation process from ne"
  Refueling the Future with Alcohol Fuels
• "Suppose we say that the risk of operating one plant would be expected to be one in ten-thousand years. That sounds pretty good until you remember that"
  Is Our Understanding of Fukushima Backwards?
• "The chart won't load. Please refer to the chart in "
  Is Our Understanding of Fukushima Backwards?
• "When nuclear power plants are evaluated for safety they are only evaluated from a mechanical risk and site risk  standpoint. We have been assured that"
  Is Our Understanding of Fukushima Backwards?